CHAPTER 7
COMPARING THE THEORIES

   
This book has been superseded! This book has been revised, corrected and rewritten with a new title and a new website at www.solvingthemassextinctions.com. Check it out!

The purpose of this chapter is to list and explore phenomena that are better explained by Ben's Antipodal Impact Theory than by the current Standard Theory. These phenomena are:


VOLCANISM AT THE SUNDA TRENCH

The Sunda (or Java) Trench, the second deepest trench in the world, extends from the east at East Timor in Indonesia all the way up to the border of Bangladesh and Burma. Along the eastern edge of the trench are the Nicobar and Andaman islands, as well as Sumatra, Java and the other islands of the Indonesian island chain.

Java and Sumatra have many active volcanoes, some of which are among the biggest in the world.

The Standard Theory explains the extreme volcanism in Java and Sumatra as being the result of subduction of the Australian-Indian plate underneath the neighboring plate.

However, the extreme volcanism stops at the northern end of Sumatra. The Sunda trench continues for hundreds of miles to the north, but, suddenly, there are no more big volcanoes as a result of subduction.

Why is this? Here we have a series of very strong volcanoes that lead northwest until they culminate at Lake Toba, the biggest super-volcano in the world. And then the volcano chain just stops. The Sunda trench goes on, but the volcano chain stops. Why? The Standard Theory has no answer at all.

Ben's Antipodal Impact Theory has a clear explanation: The follow-on antipodal hotspot from the Chixculub impact 65 MYA started at East Timor and ran up through (and created) The Indonesian chain, up through Java and up to the north end of Sumatra. The hotspot is currently below the northern end of Sumatra at Lake Toba.

The reason that there isn't any additional extreme volcanism along the Sunda trench beyond northern Sumatra is because the hotspot hasn't gotten there yet.

Furthermore, if we could zoom ten million years into the future, we would find that the hotspot's continued motion would carry it north and west and into and through the Sunda trench!

The hotspot's turn to the west after it crossed the equator can already be seen on the map. The hotspot is actually moving in a straight line relative to the mantle, but the speed of the surface layer is decreasing (at the equator, the surface layer moves at 1,000 miles per hour, but near the poles it is near zero), causing the hotspot to appear to move to the northwest, relative to the surface.

The Sunda trench is unrelated to the hotspot. The Sunda trench was created by the tail of the Indian continent pulling the surface apart, as it made its tight turn going north.

The Sunda trench is often called a double trench, because there are two distinct ridges along the trench for much of its length. It may well be that the eastern edge of the continental blob did its own pulling apart as it passed by before the tail came by later.


THE SHAPE OF INDIA

The Standard Theory doesn't really address the shape of India. The best summary of the position of the Standard Theory would be: "It is what it is."

Ben's Antipodal Impact Theory offers very clear reasons why India is shaped the way that it is, including the eastward bend near the bottom, the offset location of Sri Lanka, the west-to-east slope of the land and the formation of the Western Ghats mountain range.

Ben's Antipodal Impact Theory sees India as the tail of a continental "blob with a tail" uplift event. As the Indian tail moved northward behind the leading blob of the continent, it was configured as a normal, triangular tail.

However, when the front end of the continental blob met extreme resistance while running into the Himalayan Plateau, the energy and momentum from the rest of the continent caused most of the continent to shear (It might not have sheared. It might have just continued running under or alongside the Asian Continent while pivoting.) and pivot to the west, towards an area of less resistance. The tail followed along with this pivot, but the weaker, lower part of the tail bent as it moved west (meeting frictional resistance and raising up the Ghats) and even broke off at the tip (Sri Lanka).

The slope of the land from west-to-east was caused by the Indian tail moving over the slower-moving hotspot on the western side during the early days from 65 MYA to 60 MYA.

The westward movement of the Indian tail is further corroborated in "an Alfred Wegener moment". The upper eastern edge of India matches almost perfectly with the coast of Burma. They look like they fit together because, at one time, they did fit together. After they parted, the silt from the Ganges river helped to fill in the low lying area of Bangladesh, over millions of years. (Author's note: Alfred Wegener was a famous German meteorologist turned geologist, who formulated the theory of continental drift back in 1912, due, in part to the fact that Africa and South America seemed to fit together. He amassed much other fossil evidence, as well, but was unable to overcome the lack of a reasonable mechanism for movement of solid rock. He was vindicated two decades after his death by the discovery of the mid-ocean ridges and sea floor spreading. Wegener asserted that centrifugal forces caused the continents to move apart. This lack of a viable mechanism doomed his theory to obscurity, initially.)


RARE MANTLE PLUMES

The Standard Theory describes the volcanic eruptions at the Deccan traps and the Siberian traps as being the result of rare mantle plumes. There is no really solid reason given for their existence. The best that the Standard Theory can come up with is the idea that these plumes are some kind of convectional heat relief from the interior.

Ben's Antipodal Impact Theory shows that the plumes that caused the Deccan traps and the Siberian traps are the natural result of the relief of kinetic energy pressure at the weakened, pulverized area that is antipodal to a major cosmic impact.


CONTINENTAL SHELF & BANK STRUCTURE AND CONTINENTAL UPLIFT

The Standard Theory has little to say about the reasons why continents have the continental shelf and bank structure that they do. The Standard Theory just doesn't ask why the continents don't gently slope down to the bottom of the ocean, forming a "v" shape at the bottom.

Ben's Antipodal Impact Theory posits that continents are uplifted several thousand feet when first created. This would create a naturally steeper slope along the bank. Over time, the slope would soften, but it would still be significantly steeper than either the continental shelf or the ocean floor.

A few more words of explanation about the actual process of continental uplift may be in order. In many ways, the process of continental uplift is comparable to the process of impact extrusion (also called trapped extrusion) used in the fastener industry (see Chapter 6). The process of impact extrusion involves the extrusion of metal at the other side of the impact, when using an impact header (see Illustration 7-A).

In the case of the impact header, the cold (room temperature, not heated) mild steel blank is trapped within a hardened steel die and then hit with a hardened steel punch, using great force. At the antipode of the impact, the steel blank's metal is forced to "flow" into the reduced diameter opening at the back of the die, resulting in a steel blank with an extruded section that has a smaller diameter (NOTE: In industry, this process is often used to create a shoulder bolt that has a shoulder diameter that is considerably larger in diameter than the smaller, extruded diameter, which is usually roll threaded [a process that creates screw threads] later. Using impact extrusion is a faster, less costly and less wasteful process than shaving the extra material away. Impact extrusion also provides better concentric tolerances, as well as keeping the steel grain structure intact).

The process of continental uplift, in effect, involves trapped extrusion. In the case of the impact header, the steel blank is trapped within a hardened steel die.

In the case of continental uplift, the trapping is done by gravity (the weight of the rock of the lithosphere) and the shear strength of the rock of the lithosphere. The energy of the cosmic impact, in effect, extrudes a continental "blob with a tail" from the surface of the Earth, with the liquid mantle acting as an energy transfer mechanism.


CONTINENTAL SHAPES

Why do so many continents look like "a blob with a tail"? The Standard Theory doesn't even recognize this shape as an issue.

Yet we can see that continents are shaped this way. Once we understand the nature of combination continents (i.e. North America, Antarctica and Eurasia) it is easy to see how the continents have been created in this same, general shape.

The outstanding exception, Australia, is easily explained by the uplift of India destroying part of Australia's tail and scattering the rest of the tail.

However, once we know what we are looking for, we can see how the Australian tail fits together and how Australia's Great Dividing Range mountains continue up through New Guinea, Borneo, the Philippines and even Taiwan.

One of the most satisfying parts of the Australian puzzle is finding how New Guinea fits right into the Australian Gulf of Carpentaria, just like a piece in a jigsaw puzzle. The Cape York Peninsula was stretched out like a piece of taffy when New Guinea was forced apart from Australia 65 MYA by the rise of the Indian continent (see Chapter 8).

Another exception, Eastern Antarctica, was once part of the Australian "blob" but was sheared from Australia, probably as a result of the torsional pressure put on Australia during the uplifting of India 65 MYA. This half of the original Australian "blob" went its own way and ended up conjoined with Western Antarctica, which is a small continental mass that was probably created in the event that caused the Triassic extinction (later investigation leads to the conclusion that the uplifting of Western Antarctica led to the minor extinction prior to the Triassic extinction ... see Appendix II for details).

Further examination of the Australia - Eastern Antarctica connection reveals that this separation was probably a two stage event. First, the impact object that caused the Permian extinction 250 MYA provided torsional stress which started the separation and moved Eastern Antarctica faster to the south than the rest of the old Australian Continent. Then the Chicxulub impact created the Indian Continent and drew today's Australia to the north.


PLATE BOUNDARIES

The boundaries of the Australian Indian plate are right where Ben's Antipodal Impact Theory would predict that they would be, in relation to each other. Furthermore, one of the standard models shows a separate Indian plate (the other doesn't) right where Ben's Antipodal Impact Theory would predict, based upon the westward shifting and pivoting as the Indian continent ran into extreme resistance.

The Standard Theory gives no reason for any of this.


SEASHELLS IN THE HIMALAYAS

Until the advent of the theory of plate tectonics, geologists had great difficulty in explaining how all the ancient sea-life fossils were found in the Himalayas. The theory of plate tectonics allowed them to explain the seeming paradox. The common interpretation of this theory stated that, as the subcontinent of India approached Asia, it buckled up the sea floor in front of it and pushed the buckled sea floor into Asia.

However, the Standard Theory does not agree with itself when examined closely. According to the Standard Theory, as India and Asia approached each other, the ocean floor should have been subducting below either the Indian or the Asian plate … that's how the subduction model works (Oceanic-Continental Convergence, see Chapter 2).

Once the two continental masses ran into each other (they ran out of subducted sea floor between them), then they should have pushed each other upwards. There should have been little or no sea floor involved

And yet there are prolific remnants of an ancient sea floor all throughout the Himalayas.

Why?

Ben's Antipodal Impact Theory has no difficulty in explaining the Himalayan seashell paradox. The Indian continent's "blob" was uplifted virtually entirely from the sea floor. Only the tail of the Indian continent consisted of land that was not from the sea floor.

When the Indian "blob" smashed into Asia, it was elevated and compressed, along with the Asian plate. Since the elevated and compressed land from the Indian "blob" was virtually all composed of sea floor, it is only natural that the Himalayas would be chock full of the remains of ancient sea creatures.

See Illustration 7 - A for a graphic depiction of the impact extrusion process